Case SR240 vs New Holland L328

Case

Case SR240

$58,000

4.4★ (300)

New Holland

$55,000

4.3★ (240)

Quick take: The New Holland L328 costs $3,000 less; the New Holland L328 has a higher rated operating capacity (2,800 vs 2,400 lbs).

✓The radial lift geometry gives excellent digging and pushing force down low, and operators doing excavation and grading say it out-digs vertical-lift rivals.
✓The SR240's 24.2 GPM standard flow is generous for the class, and owners appreciate that it runs many attachments without needing the high-flow upgrade.
✓Case cabs are notably roomy, and operators coming from other brands often comment on the extra elbow room and good visibility.
✓Case pricing typically undercuts Bobcat and Cat for comparable specs, so value-focused contractors feel they get more machine for the money.
✓The FPT engine has a solid reliability reputation and doesn't use a DPF on some configurations, which owners like for reduced regen hassles.
✓The 8-way control pattern selection and adjustable EH controls make it flexible for operators used to different machines.
✓Case's ride control and comfort features hold up well for long days, and owners praise the low cab noise.
✓Two-speed travel comes standard, so ground-to-ground moves on bigger sites are quick and efficient.

✗Case's dealer network is thinner than Bobcat, Cat, or Deere, and owners in some regions report longer waits for parts and service.
✗Radial lift compromises dump height and reach at the top, making it awkward to load high-sided trucks versus vertical-lift machines.
✗Resale value trails the big three brands, so owners take a bigger hit at trade-in despite the lower purchase price.
✗Some owners report electrical and sensor gremlins on the FPT-engined machines that can be frustrating to diagnose.
✗The attachment ecosystem and used-implement availability aren't as deep as Bobcat's, limiting options in some markets.
✗Fit-and-finish, while improved, is judged by some operators as a notch below Cat and Bobcat refinement.
✗For pure truck-loading work the radial geometry is a real limitation, pushing those buyers to the vertical-lift SV340B.
✗Dealer support quality varies a lot by region, and owners say the ownership experience hinges heavily on the local dealer.

✓New Holland's patented Super Boom vertical lift gives class-leading dump height and reach, and operators say it loads the center of high-sided trucks better than anything in its price range.
✓The 129-inch hinge-pin height is exceptional for a medium frame, so stacking pallets and loading tall hoppers is genuinely easy.
✓The L328 undercuts Bobcat and Cat on price, so value-focused buyers feel they get premium lift geometry for less money.
✓The FPT engine has a solid reliability reputation, and the machine pulls strongly for a 74 hp unit in loading applications.
✓The cab is roomy with good visibility, and owners appreciate the comfortable layout and low-effort controls over long days.
✓The 24 GPM standard flow is generous, and the high-flow option opens up demanding attachments for added versatility.
✓Two-speed travel comes standard, making ground-to-ground moves quick on larger sites.
✓Owners doing a lot of loading and stacking specifically choose the Super Boom design over radial-lift competitors for the reach advantage.

✗New Holland's construction dealer network is thin in many regions, and owners report that parts and service access can be a real weak point.
✗Resale value trails the big three brands, so the lower purchase price is partly offset by a steeper depreciation hit.
✗Some owners report electrical and sensor issues on FPT-engined machines that can be frustrating to diagnose.
✗The Super Boom linkage adds pivot points and grease zerks, which owners note require diligent maintenance to avoid wear.
✗The attachment and used-implement ecosystem isn't as deep as Bobcat's, limiting options in some markets.
✗Fit-and-finish is judged by some operators as a step below Cat and Bobcat refinement.
✗Because dealers are sparse, warranty and service experience varies widely by location.
✗The vertical-lift geometry that helps loading compromises some low-end digging force versus a radial-lift machine.