Case TR340B vs John Deere 331G

Case

Case TR340B

$74,000

4.4★ (280)

John Deere

$76,000

4.5★ (340)

Quick take: The Case TR340B costs $2,000 less; the Case TR340B has a higher rated operating capacity (3,400 vs 3,100 lbs).

✓The TR340B is Case's most powerful radial CTL, and operators doing heavy dirt work praise its 8,700 lb bucket breakout force for digging and dozing.
✓The 3,400 lb rated capacity and 90 hp give it serious muscle for grading, backfilling, and moving heavy material efficiently.
✓Radial lift geometry keeps the load close for excellent digging and grading control down low, which earthmoving crews specifically value.
✓Case cabs are roomy and comfortable with good visibility, and owners appreciate the low-effort EH controls over long days.
✓Case pricing undercuts equivalent Bobcat and Cat CTLs, so value-focused buyers feel they get big-frame capability for less money.
✓The 24.2 GPM standard flow (with high-flow available) handles a wide range of attachments without immediately needing the upgrade.
✓The two-speed travel and strong tractive effort make it productive on large sites where ground-to-ground moves matter.
✓Owners report the FPT engine pulls strongly and the machine feels planted and stable when pushing heavy piles.

✗Case's dealer and parts network is thinner than the big three, and owners in some regions report frustrating waits for undercarriage and service parts.
✗Radial lift limits dump height and reach at the top, so loading high-sided trucks is awkward compared to the vertical-lift TV450B.
✗Track and undercarriage costs are significant, and owners note replacement parts add up, especially on abrasive ground.
✗Resale value trails Bobcat and Cat CTLs, so the lower purchase price is partly offset by a bigger depreciation hit.
✗Some owners report electronic and sensor issues on FPT-engined machines that can be tricky to diagnose without a good dealer.
✗The attachment and used-implement ecosystem isn't as deep as Bobcat's, limiting options in certain markets.
✗Fit-and-finish is judged by some operators as a step below Cat and Bobcat refinement.
✗Dealer support quality varies widely by region, and owners say the ownership experience depends heavily on the local dealer.

✓The 331G's 3,100 lb capacity and vertical lift make it a strong, versatile large-frame CTL that operators use for everything from grading to heavy loading.
✓The 90 hp Yanmar engine delivers solid power, and owners praise the G-Series drivetrain for reliability under sustained hard use.
✓Deere's huge dealer and financing network makes parts, service, and support easy, especially for customers already running green equipment.
✓The side-by-side cooling package resists overheating and cleans out easily in dusty, debris-heavy conditions operators face daily.
✓EH controls with selectable response let operators tune sensitivity for both precise grading and heavy production work.
✓The cab is roomy and comfortable with good visibility, and the pressurized option keeps dust out for all-day comfort.
✓The large frame and heavy operating weight give a planted, stable feel when handling heavy loads at full reach.
✓Deere CTLs hold resale value well, supported by strong brand loyalty and the popularity of the G-Series.

✗Deere parts and dealer labor are on the higher end, and owners note maintenance costs accumulate over the machine's life.
✗The Yanmar's DPF emissions system can be finicky with regen during light-duty idling, interrupting production.
✗At over 11,000 lb, the 331G requires a heavy truck and trailer to move, which smaller operators find limiting.
✗Standard hydraulic flow is adequate but demanding attachments really want the high-flow option, adding cost.
✗Some operators find the EH controls take a learning curve and feel less direct than pilot or mechanical setups.
✗New pricing reflects the Deere premium, and value shoppers note Case and New Holland large-frame CTLs undercut it.
✗Undercarriage and track costs are significant on a machine this size, especially on abrasive surfaces.
✗The large frame is overkill for tight residential work, reducing versatility versus a medium-frame CTL.