Head to head
Case TR340B against Case TV370B
The Case TR340B saves $2,000; the Case TV370B carries 210 lb more once both are rated the same way.
| Spec | Case TR340B | Case TV370B |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $74,000 | $76,000 |
| Rated capacity, as advertised | 3,400 lbs | 3,700 lbs |
| Rated at | 50% of tipping load | 50% of tipping load |
| Tipping load | 6,800 lbs | 7,400 lbs |
| Capacity at its class convention | 2,380 lbs | 2,590 lbs |
| Engine power | 90 hp | 74 hp |
| Engine | FPT | FPT |
| Auxiliary flow | 24.2 GPM | 24.2 GPM |
| Lift height | 127 in | 131.6 in |
| Operating weight | 10,000 lbs | 9,945 lbs |
| Lift path | Radial Lift | Vertical Lift |
| Rubber tracks | Yes | Yes |
| High flow available | Yes | Yes |
| Enclosed cab available | Yes | Yes |
| Two-speed travel available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-levelling available | Yes | Yes |
| A/C and heat available | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 2 yr / 2,000 hr | 2 yr / 2,000 hr |
What owners say about each
Case TR340B
- The TR340B is Case's most powerful radial CTL, and operators doing heavy dirt work praise its 8,700 lb bucket breakout force for digging and dozing.
- The 3,400 lb rated capacity and 90 hp give it serious muscle for grading, backfilling, and moving heavy material efficiently.
- Case cabs are roomy and comfortable with good visibility, and owners appreciate the low-effort EH controls over long days.
- Case pricing undercuts equivalent Bobcat and Cat CTLs, so value-focused buyers feel they get big-frame capability for less money.
- The 24.2 GPM standard flow (with high-flow available) handles a wide range of attachments without immediately needing the upgrade.
- Owners report the FPT engine pulls strongly and the machine feels planted and stable when pushing heavy piles.
- Radial lift limits dump height and reach at the top, so loading high-sided trucks is awkward compared to the vertical-lift TV450B.
- Track and undercarriage costs are significant, and owners note replacement parts add up, especially on abrasive ground.
- Some owners report electronic and sensor issues on FPT-engined machines that can be tricky to diagnose without a good dealer.
- The attachment and used-implement ecosystem isn't as deep as Bobcat's, limiting options in certain markets.
- Dealer support quality varies widely by region, and owners say the ownership experience depends heavily on the local dealer.
Case TV370B
- The 74 hp FPT engine needs no DEF and no SCR system, so owners skip the fluid top-offs and dosing-system failures that plague higher-horsepower rivals.
- A 3,700 lb rated capacity and 131.6-inch hinge pin let it load dump trucks and stack full pallets with ease - capacity that usually costs Cat 275 or Bobcat T86 money.
- Torque is the story rather than horsepower - the FPT pulls hard into piles, and operators are consistently surprised how much machine 74 hp moves.
- Case's cab is one of the widest in the industry, and the huge door opening and low entry make it a favorite among bigger operators who feel cramped in a Bobcat.
- The one-piece welded lift arm design is stout, and long-term owners report the loader geometry stays tight where multi-piece arms develop slop.
- The 8.0 mph two-speed travel and available ride control make long ground moves quick and keep material in the bucket over rough ground.
- The 'operator not fully present' seat and armrest sensor faults are a known B-series annoyance that can lock the machine until sensors are cleaned or replaced.
- At 74 hp pushing nearly 10,000 lbs, flow-hungry work like mulching feels underpowered next to 90-110 hp rivals even with the high-flow option.
- Owners report electrical gremlins and display glitches on B-series machines, and owners describe dealer software updates as a recurring fix.
- High-flow, ride control, and the performance cab package are all extra-cost options that push a well-equipped unit well past the attractive base price.
- The rigid-mount undercarriage rides rough at speed compared to torsion-suspended machines like ASV and Cat's suspended designs.
- The vertical-lift linkage limits mid-range reach compared to radial machines, so backfilling over walls takes more repositioning.