Kubota SVL75-3 vs Yanmar TL75VS

Kubota

Kubota SVL75-3

$70,000

4.6★ (650)

Yanmar

$70,000

4.3★ (55)

Quick take: The Yanmar TL75VS has a higher rated operating capacity (2,555 vs 2,490 lbs).

✓The SVL75-3 is the best-selling new CTL in America, and owners credit its blend of value, reliability, and a genuinely great cab for the popularity.
✓Kubota builds its own engine, and owners rave about the reliability and the familiar Kubota dealer network they already trust from tractors.
✓The tilt-up cab and wide-opening rear door give outstanding service access, and mechanics call it one of the easiest CTLs to maintain.
✓Vertical lift with a 123-inch hinge-pin height makes truck-loading and pallet-stacking easy, competitive with pricier vertical-lift rivals.
✓The 24.9 GPM standard flow is generous, and the high-flow option runs mulchers and planers, giving it strong attachment versatility.
✓The cab is roomy, quiet, and comfortable, and operators coming from other brands consistently say it feels bigger and better finished than expected.
✓Kubota pricing undercuts Bobcat and Cat for comparable capability, so value-focused buyers feel they get more machine for the money.
✓Resale value is excellent because the SVL is in such high demand used, protecting owners at trade-in time.

✗Kubota's construction-equipment dealer coverage, while growing, still isn't as dense as Bobcat's, so specialized parts can take longer in some areas.
✗Some owners report the undercarriage and track wear faster than expected if run heavily on abrasive surfaces.
✗At 2,490 lb capacity it's a strong medium frame but heavy-duty operators sometimes wish for more, eyeing the larger SVL97-2.
✗The DPF emissions system draws occasional complaints during heavy idling and light-duty work that trigger regen interruptions.
✗A few owners note the vertical-lift linkage adds grease points and pin wear over hard commercial use.
✗The attachment ecosystem is smaller than Bobcat's, so sourcing used implements locally can be harder in some markets.
✗Some operators find the control response less crisp than Cat or Bobcat, requiring a bit of acclimation for fine work.
✗Because it's so popular, dealer inventory and wait times for new units can be long during high-demand periods.

✓The vertical lift path puts the hinge pin at 10.5 feet, so it loads dump trucks and hoppers cleanly where radial machines in this class struggle.
✓Yanmar's own 74 hp turbo diesel meets Tier 4 Final without DEF, one less fluid to stock and one less system to fail.
✓The torsion-axle suspended undercarriage delivers a ride quality operators compare to ASV machines, letting them carry material faster over rough ground.
✓Near-360-degree visibility from the cab with a standard suspended seat makes it one of the more comfortable mid-frames to run all day.
✓A 7-inch color display and SmartAssist telematics are standard equipment, not options, which sweetens the value story against Bobcat and Deere.
✓The 7,300 lb tipping load gives it a stable, planted feel with pallet forks, and the 2,555 lb rated capacity covers most landscape and construction loads.
✓Machine-plus-track warranty coverage (2 yr/2,000 hr machine, 1 yr/1,000 hr tracks) is reassuring for a first-generation product.
✓Being built in the same Minnesota plant as ASV means the factory has decades of track-loader manufacturing experience behind it despite the new badge.

✗As a 2023-launch product there's minimal long-term reliability history, and early adopters are effectively the durability test fleet.
✗Yanmar's CTL dealer network is still sparse compared with the big four, so service access varies wildly by region.
✗Standard 21.4 gpm auxiliary flow is midpack, and the 26.7 gpm high-flow option still trails high-flow packages from Cat and Bobcat in this size.
✗Resale is a question mark - the used market hasn't priced first-generation Yanmar CTLs yet.
✗The suspended undercarriage's extra pivots and axles add greasing points and potential wear items over a rigid design.
✗No DEF is nice, but the engine still carries a DPF, so short-cycle users will deal with regen interruptions.
✗Attachment ecosystem support is generic - there's no brand-specific smart-attachment integration like Bobcat and Cat now offer.
✗The cab, while comfortable, lacks some premium options rivals offer such as heated seats or advanced camera packages.