New Holland L328 vs New Holland C327

New Holland

New Holland L328

$55,000

4.3★ (240)

New Holland

$60,000

4.2★ (140)

Quick take: The New Holland L328 costs $5,000 less; the New Holland L328 has a higher rated operating capacity (2,800 vs 2,700 lbs).

✓New Holland's patented Super Boom vertical lift gives class-leading dump height and reach, and operators say it loads the center of high-sided trucks better than anything in its price range.
✓The 129-inch hinge-pin height is exceptional for a medium frame, so stacking pallets and loading tall hoppers is genuinely easy.
✓The L328 undercuts Bobcat and Cat on price, so value-focused buyers feel they get premium lift geometry for less money.
✓The FPT engine has a solid reliability reputation, and the machine pulls strongly for a 74 hp unit in loading applications.
✓The cab is roomy with good visibility, and owners appreciate the comfortable layout and low-effort controls over long days.
✓The 24 GPM standard flow is generous, and the high-flow option opens up demanding attachments for added versatility.
✓Two-speed travel comes standard, making ground-to-ground moves quick on larger sites.
✓Owners doing a lot of loading and stacking specifically choose the Super Boom design over radial-lift competitors for the reach advantage.

✗New Holland's construction dealer network is thin in many regions, and owners report that parts and service access can be a real weak point.
✗Resale value trails the big three brands, so the lower purchase price is partly offset by a steeper depreciation hit.
✗Some owners report electrical and sensor issues on FPT-engined machines that can be frustrating to diagnose.
✗The Super Boom linkage adds pivot points and grease zerks, which owners note require diligent maintenance to avoid wear.
✗The attachment and used-implement ecosystem isn't as deep as Bobcat's, limiting options in some markets.
✗Fit-and-finish is judged by some operators as a step below Cat and Bobcat refinement.
✗Because dealers are sparse, warranty and service experience varies widely by location.
✗The vertical-lift geometry that helps loading compromises some low-end digging force versus a radial-lift machine.

✓Radial-lift geometry gives it stronger digging and prying performance at ground level than the Super Boom machines in the same lineup.
✓Simple radial arms mean fewer pivot points and grease zerks than a vertical linkage, which owners appreciate at maintenance time.
✓The 74 hp FPT engine and 8270 lb weight give it a strong power-to-weight feel for grading and pushing dirt.
✓A 32.4 GPM high-flow option lets it run brush cutters and mulchers that many radial CTLs in this class can't feed.
✓Track drive keeps it working in mud and on slopes where the wheeled 300 Series machines would spin out.
✓The wide 300 Series cab, 8-inch display, and standard backup camera carry over from the pricier models unchanged.
✓It's priced below the Case TR270B-class competition, making it one of the cheaper 74 hp CTLs from a major brand.
✓Shared CNH platform parts with Case track loaders make sourcing wear items easier than the NH dealer count implies.

✗The 98-inch dump height and modest reach make loading tall trucks awkward - buyers who load daily should step to the vertical-lift C-Series machines.
✗New Holland's construction dealer network is thin in many regions, so service and warranty support can be a long haul.
✗Radial geometry arcs the load back over the machine as it lifts, limiting placement precision at full height.
✗Track undercarriage maintenance costs are real - rollers, idlers, and rubber tracks add up fast versus a wheeled machine.
✗Resale values trail Bobcat, Cat, and Deere CTL equivalents in most markets.
✗At 8270 lbs it's heavier than several competing radial CTLs, which matters for trailering behind a 3/4-ton truck.
✗Owners report FPT emissions sensors can throw nuisance codes that are annoying to diagnose without a nearby dealer.
✗As the only radial CTL in the lineup it gets less marketing attention, and some dealers stock few units to demo or rent.